LONDON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--On 16 August the English High Court handed down judgment on the MF Global UK Limited “Client Money Shortfall Application.”
The MF Global UK Limited client money pool holds approximately $1 billion of funds, but is facing client money claims in excess of that amount. The Administrators issued the Application so that the Court could determine whether clients should also be able to make unsecured claims against the firm’s general estate and, if so, how those unsecured claims should be calculated.
The parties all agreed that clients’ client money claims are generally based on underlying contractual claims against the firm. The first issue for the Court was whether clients can claim against the general estate for the whole of those contractual claims, or whether they first have to deduct historic and expected future distributions from the client money pool. The Court ruled that clients can only claim against the general estate for so much of their contractual claims (if any) as have not been paid, and are not expected to be paid, from the client money pool.
The second and third issues were whether clients can also claim against the general estate for the difference between: (a) the value of their claims against the client money pool, and (b) the amounts expected in fact to be recovered by the clients from the client money pool (shortfall claims). It was common ground between the parties that, if a client could make such a claim, it could only do so in respect of such part of the shortfall as results from a failure by the firm to comply with the provisions of CASS 7 (chapter 7 of the FSA’s Client Assets Sourcebook). The Court held that a client can make such a claim insofar as it arises from a failure by the firm to comply with CASS 7, but only if and to the extent that, when added to a client’s expected recoveries from the client money pool, that claim would exceed the value of the client’s contractual claim.
Mark Lawford in Weil's Business Finance & Restructuring team in London commented that: "the issues in the Application arose because of the anticipated shortfall in the client money pool, but were complicated by the disparity in valuation techniques for client money claims and unsecured claims which resulted from the judgment on the Hindsight Application. This meant that, even if certain clients were paid in full on their client money claims, they would still have an unpaid portion of their contractual claim. Certain other clients were in the opposite position. The outcome is a great result for the MF Global UK Limited general estate, as it prevents clients with aggregate client money claims valued at more than $1 billion from claiming in full against the general estate in addition to claiming against the client money pool (the respondents had argued that the two estates should be treated for these purposes as if one were the guarantor of the other). ”
The Client Money Shortfall Application was led by London partner and head of Weil's London Restructuring team, Adam Plainer, assisted by Mark Lawford, Tom Laidler, and Kirsten Erichsen. The Administrators were represented in Court by Antony Zacaroli QC and Adam Al-Attar of 3/4 South Square.
As part of its representation of the Administrators of MF Global UK Limited, which is the largest European collapse since Lehman, Weil is fielding a multi-disciplinary team, led by Adam Plainer. This judgment follows a series of historic landmark Court approvals, including, initially in July last year of the first distribution plan for the return of client assets under the special administration regime, and most recently in June this year, the Client Money Distribution Procedure.
Notes to Editors
Weil, Gotshal & Manges is an international law firm of over 1,200 lawyers, including approximately 300 partners. Weil, Gotshal is headquartered in New York, with offices in Beijing, Boston, Budapest, Dallas, Dubai, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, Houston, London, Miami, Munich, Paris, Prague, Princeton, Providence, Shanghai, Silicon Valley, Warsaw, Washington, D.C. and Wilmington.
The firm is not authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 but we are able, in certain circumstances, to offer a limited range of investment services to clients because we are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. We can provide these investment services if they are an incidental or necessary part of the professional services we have been engaged to provide.
We currently hold your contact details, which we use to send you information about events, publications and services provided by the firm that may be of interest to you. We only use your details for marketing and other internal administration purposes. If your contact details are incorrect or to manage your Weil subscriptions please follow this link. If you would like to be removed from all future mailings please also follow this link or reply to this email with your request.
These materials may contain attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org, and destroy the original message. Thank you.